Our blog contains short snippets from our full research coverage. We release new content regularly, so check back often for the latest insights.
In the course of due diligence work I was doing for a client in the remittance space, I stumbled across TransferWise’s Board of Shame. TransferWise is one of the more notable Financial Technology companies in the remittance space. Their Board of Shame was a marketing initiative to highlight the fees that traditional remittance companies hide through a mark-up in their exchange rates. Poking around their website, TransferWise’s message is clear and consistent: unlike existing remittance players, we do not hide fees in exchange-rate mark-ups; we are able to offer low prices because our technology makes our money transfer process more efficient.
Last week, Funding Circle announced that it had raised $65M in venture capital, only nine months after its last $37M round. Funding Circle is a British peer-to-peer (P2P) lending site that allows individuals to lend money directly to UK small and medium businesses. A key benefit of Funding Circle loans is in their fast approvals (“a few days”, compared to a 15-20 week process at traditional banks) at similar interest rates. The company recently expanded into the US by merging with US-based Endurance Lending Network in October 2013. In the US, the peer-to-peer lending space is dominated by two companies — Lending Club and Prosper — given the regulatory complexity in the US. These two companies corner 98% of a fast growing multi-billion dollar market (source). Just last week, market-leader Lending Club announced that it had crossed the $5B mark in total loans issued, with $1B of it issued in the past quarter alone (source). Last month, Lending Club was also reported to be planning a $500M IPO in the second-half of 2014; the company was valued at $3.8B in April this year, a 63% jump from November 2013(source). In the area of P2P loans specifically for businesses, Lending Club is the only one out of the two that offers business loans.
The past few weeks have seen several launch and funding announcements in the consumer banking space. Recently, German-based NUMBER26 raised a $2M seed round from investors including Axel Springer Plug and Play (more here), while another German-based startup, Avuba, just graduated from TechStars London (more here). Across the channel, UK-based Osper raised $10M from investors including Index Ventures and Horizons Ventures (Li Ka-Shing’s venture capital arm) to target the youth market (more here). UK-based Atom Bank, also raised ‘a six-figure investment’ with the aim of launching in 2015 (more here). Closer to home, Moven just raised $8M from investors including Sberbank’s SBT Venture Capital, Anthemis Group, and Standard Bank to expand overseas starting with Canada and New Zealand (more here). Other notable US-based companies include Simple, which was recently acquired by BBVA in February this year for $117M; and GoBank, part of Green Dot Bank which has specializes in re-loadable pre-paid cards targeted at the unbanked). Click here to see other similar companies tackling the Consumer Banking space.
I recently did some research for a friend who was looking at the online escrow space in the world of Financial Technology. There has been much talk about how bitcoin has the potential to ‘decentralize trust’, with implications on services like online escrow. Escrow services are used for a variety of transactions, from domain name purchases to investments. Sites like escrow.com and Agreed exist to facilitate the escrow of online transactions. The transaction fees for such services range from around 1-6%, depending on the amount (source). Escrow fraud — where sellers receive notice of payment from an “escrow service”, which turns out to have never existed at all — is a common form of fraud; online escrow sites have to be licensed, under existing escrow law at the state level.
TransferWise announced a $25M funding round last week, with investors including Richard Branson, Peter Thiel’s Valar Ventures, IA Ventures, and Index Ventures. The London-based startup aims to disrupt the remittance market by offering lower fees. They do this by operating a peer-to-peer (P2P) transfer model, where money destined for transfer does not actually leave each country unnecessarily (i.e. rearranging cash from other transactions in the same country). Software automation and the absence of physical branches also allow them to pass on cost-savings to the consumer. Consumers are also offered a mobile app (iOS and Android). Co-founder, Taavet Hinrikus, was the first employee at Skype.
In the past year I’ve been hearing quite a bit about “Beacon” such as — Shopkick piloting its shopBeacon for in-store marketing, PayPal using their own beacon for hands-free check-ins and payments, and Qualcomm pushing its Gimbal SDK for developers.
At this time, I am tracking 440 FinTech companies across 15 categories, with a combined funding amount of $7.47B. These are relatively new companies that either serve existing pieces of the financial system or develop alternatives to those pieces. It includes B2B and B2C companies.
Last week, Financial Times reported that Facebook was entering financial services. Facebook is reportedly on track to receive regulatory approval to be an ‘e-money’ institution in Ireland (by extension, Europe through a process called “passporting”). The social network is also looking at remittances, having talked to several remittance startups. “Facebook wants to become a utility in the developing world, and remittances are a gateway drug to financial inclusion,” a person familiar with the company’s strategy was quoted.
Virtual reality goggles, messaging apps, and anonymous-sharing — these spaces have been getting a lot of interest recently with mind-blowing exits and controversy. Why aren’t FinTech startups getting as much love from investors and corporates? A panel of FinTech startup founders at the SF FinTech meet-up shared additional challenges that FinTech startups have to overcome:Trust — When it comes to money, there is an additional trust barrier. Privacy and security become an order-of-magnitude more important when a request is made to directly access a user’s bank account and financial information. Trust is also a barrier between startups and financial organizations that are highly regulated, making a B2B sales/partnership model even more difficult for startups than it already is. Startups also have little room for error. For giants like Target, they will be able to survive long enough to regain consumer’s trust. For resource-constrained startups, it would be extremely difficult to rebuild a reputation once it is lost.Regulation — The financial industry is a highly regulated one, more so after the worst financial crisis since the Great Depression. Having to deal with compliance is distracting and takes away time that could have otherwise been spent on building a great product. FinTech startups in the US have to comply with regulation at the federal level as well as the state level, with each of the 50 states having their own views on how the industry should be regulated. This also makes it time-consuming and expensive to scale to different markets. The absence of relationships with regulators makes it difficult for founders to voice their concerns.Limited Viral Effects — They way most incentive structures of venture capitalists are structured, the opportunity cost is a major consideration — they are looking for 100x or 1000x returns, not just 5x returns. The fastest way to achieve this is to grow virally and leverage network effects. When it comes to sensitive personal financial information, it is far more unlikely that users would be willing to share what they are doing with friends.Obtaining Financial Data — For FinTech startups that need to pull financial data from different sources, the key challenge is in obtaining accurate and complete data. The US government has been attempting open data initiatives, but access to data can be expensive.Doing any startup is hard enough; the additional hurdles that FinTech founders have to overcome make FinTech a difficult market to operate in. That said, the financial markets are the few markets that are worth in the trillions. The financial crisis of 2008 has resulted in a seismic shift in the industry. Pressure from regulators and shareholders are forcing banks to leave money on the table for FinTech startups to take. The hardest markets are usually the ones with the greatest opportunity — for those that are able to cross the high barrier, those would be the same barriers protecting them from competition. More importantly, FinTech founders can actually make a meaningful impact in people’s lives.Read More
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.